National Innovation Capability Variables and Dimensions

Ahmad Dading Gunadi; Yandra Arkeman; Rizal Syarief Siaiful Nazli; Teguh Rahardjo; Aulijati Wachjudiningsih

doi:10.14203/STIPM.2018.138

National Innovation Capability Variables and Dimensions

Ahmad Dading Gunadi, Yandra Arkeman, Rizal Syarief Siaiful Nazli, Teguh Rahardjo, Aulijati Wachjudiningsih

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the dimensions and variables of National Innovation Capability. The findings in this paper are to refine the National Innovation Capabilities Dimension model developed by Chang and Lin (2012) by integrating a Network Dimension of Innovation. This paper analyzes the dimensions and variables of National Innovation Capability through a system approach that includes Input Sub System, Process Sub System, and Output Sub System. Network Dimensions Innovation is an integral part of the National Innovation Capabilities Dimension. This dimension is an important part, because the National Innovation Capability will largely depend on how innovative actors form networks and interact among them. The dimensions of National Innovation Capability are integrated into three sub system in a systems approach that includes input, process, and output. In the input consists of Dimensions of Innovation Resources. In the process consists of Innovation Demand Dimension, Innovation Network Dimension and Innovation Diffusion Dimension. In the output consists of Dimensions of Innovation Output. Each Dimension has some different variables. The entire dimensions and variables of these three sub system become unified as a Dimension and Variable of National Innovation Capability.

Keywords: National Innovation Capability, Dimensions, Variables, Sub Systems

Full Text:

PDF

References

Belitz, H; Clemens, M; Sch midt-Ehmcke and Jens Werwatz. (2008). Deficits in education endanger Germany's innovative capacity. DIW Berlin, 14(4), 86-93. German Institute for Economic Research.

Bloch, C., Ebersberger, B., & Hersta, S. J. (2012). Open Innovation Practices And Their Effect On Innovation Performance. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management.

Cancar, S.S., Petkovesek, V. (2013). Private and Public Sector Innovation and The Importance of Cross-Sector Collaboration. Journal of Applied Business Research. Volume 29, Iss. 6, (Nov/Dec)

Chang, S.C., Liu, P.H. (2012). A Preliminary Study on the Structural Model of National Innovation Capability. The Journal of International Management Studies, Volume 7, Number 1, April.

Chang, Y., Cui, X. (2013). The Interactive Relationship of Transnational Technology Transfer & Diffusion and National Innovation Capability. International Journal of Business and Management; Vol. 8, No. 21.

Chen, P.C., Hu, J.L., Yang, C.H. (2011). An International Comparison of R&D efficiency of Multiple Innovative Output: The Role of the national Innovation System. Innovation: Management, policy & practice 13: 341-360.

Commission of the European Communities (2003). 2003 European Innovation Scoreboard: Technical Paper No 1 Indicators and Definitions. Luxembourg.

Castellacci, F., Natera, J.M. (2013). The dynamics of national innovation systems: A panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity. Research Policy. Volume 42, Issue 3, April 2013, Pages 579-594.

Chu, A.,C. (2010). Effects of Patent Policy on Income and Consumption Inequality in a R&D Growth Model. Southern Economic Journal, 77(2), 336-350.

Edler J, Cunningham P, Gök A and Shapira P. (2013). Impacts of innovation policy: Synthesis and conclusion. Compendium of evidence on the effectiveness of innovation policy No. 20. University of Manchester Business School-National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts. United Kingdom.

Eseryel, U.Y. (2014). IT-Enabled Knowledge Creation for Open Innovation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. Volume 15, Special Issue, pp 805-834, November.

Fan, P. (2008). Innovation capacity and economic development: China and India, Research Paper, UNU-WIDER, United Nations University (UNU), No. 2008/31, ISBN 978-92-9230-077-7

Fageberg, J., Scholec, M. And Knell, M. (2007). The Competitiveness of Nations: Wh Some Countries Prosper While Others Fall Behind. World Development, 35(10): 1595-620.

Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, The Free Press, New York, NY.

Gans, J. and Stern, S.. (2003). Acessing Australia's Innovative Capacity in the 21st Century. Law School Building. Melbourne.

Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey, Journal of Economic Literature 28(4).1661-1707

Global Economic Forum. (2017). The Global Competitiveness Report 2017-2018. 2017.. Accessed dated 25 December 2017.

Gould, D. M., & Gruben, W. C. (1996). The role of intellectual property rights in economic growth. Journal of Development Economics, 48(2), 323-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(95)00039-9

Ibata-Arens, K. (2008). Comparing national innovation systems in Japan and the United States: Push, pull, drag and jump factors in the development of new technology. Asia Pacific Business Review, 14(3), 315-338.

Innovation Union Scoreboard. (2014). http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/6993/attachments/1/translations/en/renditions/native. Accessed dated 25 December 2017.

INSEAD (Institut Européen d'administration des Affaires).(2017). The Global Innovation Index 2017 Report. https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/. Access dated December 25, 2017.

Kayal, A. A. (2008). "National innovation systems a proposed framework for developing countries," International Journal Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 8(1), 74-86 (2008).

Kutlaca, D., (2008). Measurement of National Innovation Capacity: Indicators for Serbia. PRIME Indicators Conference, Oslo, May 28-30, 2008.

Liu, X., Xiao, W. and Huang, X. (2008). "Bounded entrepreneurship and internationalization of indigenous Chinese private-owned firms", International Business Review, Vol. 17, pp. 488-508.

Lu, J.W. and Beamish, P.W. (2001). "The internationalization and performance of SMEs", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 565-586.

Manzini, S.T. (2012). The National System of Innovation Cencept: An Ontological Review and Critique. South Africa Journal Sci. 2012;108(9/10), Art. #1038, 7 pages. http:// dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajs. v108i9/10.1038.

Natario, M.M.S., Couto J.P.A, Tiago, M.T.B., Braga, A.,M.,M,. (2011). Evaluating The Determinants of National Capacity among European Countries. Global Journal of Management and Business Research. Volume 11 Issue 11 Version 1.0 November 2011

OECD. (1997). National innovation System. OECD Publication.

Park, W. G., & Ginarte, J. C. (1997). Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Contemporary Economic Policy, 15(3), 51-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1997.tb00477.x

Peng, MW and Wang, D.Y. (2000). Innovation Capability and Foreign Direct Investment: Toward a Learning Option Perspective. Management International Review. Special Issue 2000/1, page 79-93.

Qing-dong, L., Jing, N. (2010). Evaluation on Integrated Innovation Capability of Regions Based on Principal Component Analysis.Canadian Social Science. Vol. 6, No. 4, 2010, pp. 12-19

Qiquan, Y., Changlin, G., Welguo, S., Chen, W. (2006). Benchmarking National Innovation Capability: Indicators Frameworks and Primary Findings. National Research Center for Science and Technology for Development. Dipresentasikan pada Workshop Indikator OECD-MOST. China.

Radosevic, S. (2004). A two tier or multitier Europe? Assesing the Innovation Capabilities of Central and East European Countires in The Enlarged EU. Journal of Common Market Studies, 4C(3), 641-666.

Rogers, EM. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition. New York. The Free Press,

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14203/STIPM.2018.138